USE CASES · PARCEL LOCKERS

PARCEL LOCKER EXPANSION · ROLLOUT DECISIONS

Choose where parcel lockers go next, and prove why

Identify where the next boxes should go, rank the strongest candidates, and validate rollout decisions in the field before budget is committed.

ROLLOUT BOARD

REGION SE · BATCH 1 · 38 CANDIDATES

Schematic city map: existing locker banks with coverage rings, two lockers overlapping, and a dashed coverage gap zone holding candidate locker sites

Existing locker

Candidate

Coverage gap

SHORTLIST · SCORED ON ONE MODEL

C·01 · R1

Field-confirmed

Riverside

COVERAGE +2,400 HH · OVERLAP 4%

C·02 · R2

In field

Station north

DEMAND HIGH · OVERLAP 18%

C·03 · R9

Rejected

Old town

DUPLICATES 2 LOCKERS

WHY IT BREAKS DOWN

Where locker rollout budget quietly leaks

In out-of-home delivery the winner is whoever builds the densest well-placed network, so every misplaced box counts twice: the budget it consumed and the better site it displaced.

01°

01°

Not every gap deserves a box

White space on a map is not demand. Fill a quiet gap and the locker sits underused while the budget was needed two districts away.

02°

02°

Strong on paper, unworkable on the street

A high-scoring candidate can still fail on footprint, access or visibility. Weak sites must be rejected before rollout, not after installation.

03°

03°

Nearby lockers quietly cannibalise each other

Placed too close, a new box splits pickups with your own network instead of expanding it. The site looks busy; the network gained nothing.

04°

04°

Rollout logic matters as much as site quality

Batch one decides utilisation for years, yet HQ plans centrally and field teams judge locally, often on different criteria.

HOW MOST ROLLOUTS RUN TODAY

Intuition and a familiar map

Different criteria in every region

Spreadsheets and ad hoc analyses

Overlap discovered after installation

Field checks disconnected from the plan

WITH A ROLLOUT COMMAND SYSTEM

Coverage gaps found and sized first

Every candidate scored on one shared model

Overlap and cannibalisation checked before rollout

Shortlisted sites confirmed or rejected on the ground

A ranked, field-confirmed rollout plan everyone can defend

OFFICE TO FIELD

From office shortlist to field-confirmed rollout

One rollout workflow. The office finds and ranks candidate sites, field teams confirm or reject them on the ground, and the decision updates on the same shared basis. Then the next region runs the same logic.

IN THE OFFICE · PLAN

Find and rank the candidates

Detect white spaces and undercovered areas worth filling

Compare candidate sites on one scoring model

Rank likely winners by coverage gain and overlap

CANDIDATE RANKING

Riverside

Station north

Old town

IN THE FIELD · VALIDATE

Confirm the site or reject it early

Check physical fit: footprint, access, visibility

Confirm surroundings and everyday pickup convenience

Reject weak sites before budget is committed

Field checks run in CleverMaps Field, the mobile app your field team already carries in a pocket.

CleverMaps Field mobile app: locality survey for new box placements, shown with demo data
CleverMaps Field mobile app: locality survey for new box placements, shown with demo data

CLEVERMAPS FIELD · REAL APP, DEMO DATA

BACK TO DECISION · ROLL OUT

Approve the batch and repeat

Field results update the same site record and ranking

Approved sites enter the rollout in staged batches

The next region and market reuse the same logic

ROLLOUT · BATCH 1

Riverside

APPROVED

Station north

APPROVED

Old town

REJECTED

2 SITES TO INSTALL · BATCH 2 IN SCORING

THE SCORING MODEL

Why some candidates deserve rollout, and others do not

A locker earns its place through several factors at once, and their weight differs by territory. A city-centre commercial zone rewards passing footfall and daily routines. A suburban catchment rewards nearby households and easy access by car.

One shared basis that reflects territory, built on trusted location data joined with your own network and parcel volumes, and validated across distance bands from 200 m to a 10-minute walk. The same model scores the lockers you already run, so network review and expansion follow one logic.

SCORE COMPOSITION

How much each factor weighs in the site score, by territory

City centre

Suburban

DEMAND

Nearby population and parcel demand

90

84

ATTRACTION

Commercial attractiveness of the spot

82

44

ACCESS

Accessibility and everyday convenience

68

86

COVERAGE GAIN

Likely contribution to network coverage

56

92

OVERLAP

Overlap with your existing network

74

66

COMPETITION

Competitor lockers and pickup points

60

48

City centre: footfall and the quality of the spot decide

Suburban: nearby households and coverage gain decide

ILLUSTRATIVE WEIGHTS · TUNED PER MARKET AND TERRITORY

WHAT TEAMS GET

What changes for the rollout team

ROLLOUT BUDGET

Fewer weak placements, less budget wasted

Thin demand and unworkable spots fail in scoring or in the field check, before a locker is ordered, installed and quietly underused.

NETWORK HEALTH

Coverage grows without cannibalisation

Overlap is checked at network level before every batch, so new boxes add pickups instead of splitting them with your own network.

HQ + FIELD

One handoff from shortlist to approval

Office and field work the same site record, agreement comes faster, and the same rollout logic repeats in every region and market.

WHY CLEVERMAPS

Tools that describe are not tools that decide

SPREADSHEETS

Good for lists, weak for network logic

A spreadsheet cannot see that two candidates share a catchment, and criteria drift between files and regions.

DASHBOARDS

Good for reporting, weak for choosing the next box

A dashboard tells you how existing lockers did last quarter. It does not rank candidates or send a shortlist to the field.

GENERIC GIS

Good for specialists, not a rollout workflow

GIS shows the layers, but a rollout team needs scoring, ranking and field validation it can run itself, without a GIS desk.

ONE-OFF STUDY

Good once, weak as an operating model

A consulting deliverable answers one batch and ages. The network asks the same question again every quarter.

CLEVERMAPS

A shared rollout decision system

Scoring, ranking, field validation and batch approval for the next parcel locker locations, in one repeatable workflow from office to field.

Built on trusted location data, shared decision logic and one platform that runs the decision from office to field.

PROOF

Proven on a national locker rollout

FEATURED CASE STUDY

The data science behind Dr. Max parcel locker expansion

Dr. Max shortlisted parcel locker sites centrally with catchment modelling and demand scoring, then expanded the network with sharper site selection and less wasted capital. The same rollout workflow now plans new regions.

LOGISTICS · OUT-OF-HOME DELIVERY

Every candidate location is scored on one shared model covering demand, accessibility, competition and overlap with your existing network. Candidates are ranked by likely network impact, shortlisted sites are confirmed in the field, and the rollout order follows that evidence rather than local judgment.
50.1033, 14.4458 · DĚLNICKÁ HQ

30-MINUTE WORKING SESSION

Bring the markets you are evaluating now

Give us the regions, cities or candidate sites on your list. In 30 minutes we will show how CleverMaps would rank the next parcel locker locations and take the shortlist to the field, on your own network.

CleverMaps footer visual for location intelligence and GeoDecision workflows

The GeoDecision platform
for the people who decide

CONTACT

CleverMaps, a.s.

Vídeňská 101/119

619 00 Brno, Czech Republic

© 2026 CleverMaps, a.s. · VAT CZ03728277

SOC 2 TYPE II · ISO 27001 · EU DATA RESIDENCY

CleverMaps footer visual for location intelligence and GeoDecision workflows

The GeoDecision platform
for the people who decide

CONTACT

CleverMaps, a.s.

Vídeňská 101/119

619 00 Brno, Czech Republic

© 2026 CleverMaps, a.s. · VAT CZ03728277

SOC 2 TYPE II · ISO 27001 · EU DATA RESIDENCY

CleverMaps footer visual for location intelligence and GeoDecision workflows

The GeoDecision platform
for the people who decide

CONTACT

CleverMaps, a.s.

Vídeňská 101/119

619 00 Brno, Czech Republic

© 2026 CleverMaps, a.s. · VAT CZ03728277

SOC 2 TYPE II · ISO 27001 · EU DATA RESIDENCY